<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Sonic Message Manager</title>
	<atom:link href="http://queuemanager.nl/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://queuemanager.nl</link>
	<description>A compelling replacement for the JMS Test Client</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 14:53:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Support for Sonic 8.0 added by Gerco Dries</title>
		<link>http://queuemanager.nl/2010/04/14/support-for-sonic-8-0-added/comment-page-1/#comment-55</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerco Dries</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 14:53:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://queuemanager.nl/?p=101#comment-55</guid>
		<description>The download page lists several versions of SMM for download. Each supported Sonic version requires a separate download! All of the download links are for SMM version 2.3.

If you had previously installed SMM for your version of Sonic, you do not need to re-download! It will be updated automatically through the Java Web Start update mechanism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The download page lists several versions of SMM for download. Each supported Sonic version requires a separate download! All of the download links are for SMM version 2.3.</p>
<p>If you had previously installed SMM for your version of Sonic, you do not need to re-download! It will be updated automatically through the Java Web Start update mechanism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Support for Sonic 8.0 added by Brian Schalme</title>
		<link>http://queuemanager.nl/2010/04/14/support-for-sonic-8-0-added/comment-page-1/#comment-54</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Schalme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 14:43:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://queuemanager.nl/?p=101#comment-54</guid>
		<description>Note that an attempt to use Sonic Message Manager 2.3 to connect to a Sonic 7.6.2 Domain results in the error dialog box &quot;Failed to connect to config server: Directory Service is not the required version. Evidently SMM 2.3 is not backward compatible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Note that an attempt to use Sonic Message Manager 2.3 to connect to a Sonic 7.6.2 Domain results in the error dialog box &#8220;Failed to connect to config server: Directory Service is not the required version. Evidently SMM 2.3 is not backward compatible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sonic Message Manager 2.2 released by Gerco Dries</title>
		<link>http://queuemanager.nl/2010/02/17/sonic-message-manager-2-2-released/comment-page-1/#comment-53</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerco Dries</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 19:15:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://queuemanager.nl/?p=95#comment-53</guid>
		<description>I have created ticket number #155 to track this enhancement. I&#039;ll take a look at what&#039;s causing the less-than-useful formatting when I get time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have created ticket number #155 to track this enhancement. I&#8217;ll take a look at what&#8217;s causing the less-than-useful formatting when I get time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sonic Message Manager 2.2 released by Gerco Dries</title>
		<link>http://queuemanager.nl/2010/02/17/sonic-message-manager-2-2-released/comment-page-1/#comment-52</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerco Dries</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 17:54:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://queuemanager.nl/?p=95#comment-52</guid>
		<description>As far as I know, this is not possible without using management security. The ability to execute management requests (like requesting a queue list) means that you can execute *any* management request. This is the reason management security has been added to sonic in the first place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As far as I know, this is not possible without using management security. The ability to execute management requests (like requesting a queue list) means that you can execute *any* management request. This is the reason management security has been added to sonic in the first place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sonic Message Manager 2.2 released by Jimmy Poulin</title>
		<link>http://queuemanager.nl/2010/02/17/sonic-message-manager-2-2-released/comment-page-1/#comment-51</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy Poulin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 21:49:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://queuemanager.nl/?p=95#comment-51</guid>
		<description>Is it possible, without management security, to give access to SMM to users without giving them admin access to Sonic Management Console? I have tried what is indicated in the SMM manual but doing so allows the user to create/delete queues etc.. Thanks in advance</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it possible, without management security, to give access to SMM to users without giving them admin access to Sonic Management Console? I have tried what is indicated in the SMM manual but doing so allows the user to create/delete queues etc.. Thanks in advance</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sonic Message Manager 2.2 released by Hugo Boog</title>
		<link>http://queuemanager.nl/2010/02/17/sonic-message-manager-2-2-released/comment-page-1/#comment-49</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugo Boog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 16:46:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://queuemanager.nl/?p=95#comment-49</guid>
		<description>Hi,

I would like it very much if the text formatting returns to the v2.0 style.
In v2.0 it was (more) pretty-printed, which is very useful when browsing lots of (header) messages.
The current formatting makes it more difficult to see differences.

Regards,

Hugo Boog</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>I would like it very much if the text formatting returns to the v2.0 style.<br />
In v2.0 it was (more) pretty-printed, which is very useful when browsing lots of (header) messages.<br />
The current formatting makes it more difficult to see differences.</p>
<p>Regards,</p>
<p>Hugo Boog</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sonic Message Manager v1.5 released by Gerco Dries</title>
		<link>http://queuemanager.nl/2008/07/22/sonic-message-manager-v15-released/comment-page-1/#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerco Dries</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 15:59:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://queuemanager.nl/2008/07/22/sonic-message-manager-v15-released/#comment-30</guid>
		<description>This requires a connection to the management broker to enumerate the available message brokers and the queues that exist on those brokers. It cannot do this when connecting directly to a message broker and thus it cannot work.

It will work fine if you have multiple brokers listening on different ports and on different servers, as long as you have entered their TCP_ACCEPTORs correctly (with the full url to the machine/port).

If you do not have access to the management broker it is impossible to use this tool and you should use the JMS Test Client. A version that will allow this kind of use would not be trivial to create as you would need an interface to define the available brokers and queues manually. It would take several days of development to do this and I just haven&#039;t the time to do it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This requires a connection to the management broker to enumerate the available message brokers and the queues that exist on those brokers. It cannot do this when connecting directly to a message broker and thus it cannot work.</p>
<p>It will work fine if you have multiple brokers listening on different ports and on different servers, as long as you have entered their TCP_ACCEPTORs correctly (with the full url to the machine/port).</p>
<p>If you do not have access to the management broker it is impossible to use this tool and you should use the JMS Test Client. A version that will allow this kind of use would not be trivial to create as you would need an interface to define the available brokers and queues manually. It would take several days of development to do this and I just haven&#8217;t the time to do it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sonic Message Manager v1.5 released by Jignesh Sheth</title>
		<link>http://queuemanager.nl/2008/07/22/sonic-message-manager-v15-released/comment-page-1/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>Jignesh Sheth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 15:51:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://queuemanager.nl/2008/07/22/sonic-message-manager-v15-released/#comment-29</guid>
		<description>I have customer that would love to use this tool. However, it does not work for their implementation because the tool requires always connect only to management broker. Their message broker is listening on a different port than the management broker and do not have access to management broker in environments other than development. Any future plan??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have customer that would love to use this tool. However, it does not work for their implementation because the tool requires always connect only to management broker. Their message broker is listening on a different port than the management broker and do not have access to management broker in environments other than development. Any future plan??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Updates to nightly builds by Mario Couthino</title>
		<link>http://queuemanager.nl/2008/05/28/updates-to-nightly-builds/comment-page-1/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>Mario Couthino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 19:32:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://queuemanager.nl/2008/05/28/updates-to-nightly-builds/#comment-26</guid>
		<description>Is it possible for the list of queues to include system queues as well. i.e. deadmessage and routing queue</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it possible for the list of queues to include system queues as well. i.e. deadmessage and routing queue</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Nightly builds now available by Tako Grijpma</title>
		<link>http://queuemanager.nl/2008/03/03/nightly-builds-now-available/comment-page-1/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>Tako Grijpma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 10:04:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://queuemanager.nl/2008/03/03/nightly-builds-now-available/#comment-12</guid>
		<description>Queuefilter is available in the Nightly Build!!
Just click on the columname to set the filter value.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Queuefilter is available in the Nightly Build!!<br />
Just click on the columname to set the filter value.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

